This blog provides advice to writers on their literary work.
See the end of this post for links on these topics: How can you get the full benefit of workshops? How can you work best with your mentor? What, when, and how should you publish?
Sometimes, in your
growth as a writer, you get past an obstacle that has stood in your path for a long time. You find yourself suddenly able to do something you
couldn’t do before, maybe even something you didn’t know you should be doing. That new ability could
be using language free of cliché phrases, creating plots with sufficient peril for the
protagonist that the reader wants to know the outcome, letting the characters
develop through the action of the plot instead of through exposition, or
writing about topics that have genuine urgency for you. You pass the obstacle,
you know what you have to do next time you see a similar impasse. You’ve
reached a new plateau in your writing.
Once you’re on
that plateau, vistas open up. So many possibilities unfold for your writing
that you couldn’t access before. Suddenly you get it. You feel empowered. It’s
the literary equivalent of a growth spurt for a kid. Writing comes more easily
to you. That doesn’t mean the path is level, but you’ve crossed terrain like
this before, and you know you can get over the boulders and the chasms. Those
moments in your writing stand out as crucial milestones that will help guide
you through the rest of your career as an author.
But as you explore
the plateau, you begin to see new kinds of obstacles. Why hadn’t you noticed them
before? Suddenly they stare you in the face. That piece of writing that you had
just used your new-found skills to improve—now other errors glare at you. Why
are you still using verbs that aren’t active? The verb “to be” appears in every
other sentence, slowing the flow of the action. It can’t possibly be time to revise
again, right after you solved all the problems?
Yes, it can. The
reason is that once we arrive at a plateau, new obstacles become visible that
were hiding before. They were using the other difficulties as cover. Now the
culprits have no more camouflage. It’s time to flush the new errors out of the
bushes, and to work on those.
Is there no rest? To
put it simply: no.
As the French
surrealist André Breton said in his poem The Estates General, “There will always be a wind-shovel in the sands
of the dream” (“Il y aura toujours une pelle au vent dans les sables du rêve”).
OK, I have to admit, I don’t really know what this quote means. What the heck
is a “wind-shovel,” and could it lower my energy bills? But seriously, I read this
passage from Breton as saying that change is as inevitable as shifting sand, or
as the fresh desires that continually crop up in our dreams. Not only that, the
tools themselves for the next change are something we can’t even imagine yet,
like a “wind-shovel.”
In other words, with
each new plateau we scale, we see the next plateau looming above. That may seem
exhausting, but without that continual challenge, what would be the fun of
writing?
Not long ago I was sitting around a
table with three people I know, all of us in late middle age. One has made his
living helping municipalities draw up bond issues, one is a lawyer, the third
is a social worker. We were talking about our dream careers, what work we would
have really wanted to do if we had had our druthers. The first person said he
wanted to be a musician. The lawyer wanted to be a novelist. The social worker
wanted to be an actor. All would have chosen a career in the arts.
When it was my
turn, I could honestly say that, as a writer, I’m doing exactly the work I’ve
always wanted to do. I actually get to write poetry and drama, and to translate
writers whose work I idolize. True, I don’t make a living at my vocation, and
I need to piece together more than one job to make ends meet. But I was the
only one at that table who could say that I had no regrets about my career
choice.
That doesn’t mean
that I have no second thoughts. There are times when the choice I’ve made to be
an artist is agonizing. I’ve had to tell my daughter that she needed to wait to
get her impacted wisdom teeth out, because the limited insurance I have didn’t
cover the procedure during the current year (fortunately she wasn't in serious pain). I have to concede to contracts with
publishers where the royalties are so small I might as well give away the hard work that took me years to finish. Then I hear people with more lucrative jobs
describe their astounding vacations on the Galapagos Islands or at a villa in
Tuscany, and the envy rises in me.
But I do feel
enormous gratitude for being a writer. I picture literature as a river as wide
as the Nile or the Mississippi or the Amazon. That river is fed by many
different tributaries, which in turn are filled by many rivulets. If I can add
a few drops to one of those rivulets, I feel I will have done my job as an
artist. And if someone comes up to me after a reading and tells me they liked a particular poem I read, if I win a prize or two, if I get a good
review here or there (rarer than a prize these days), I won’t complain.
We speak music. We’re not
always aware of the sounds of our words, but speech is constantly morphing into
music. Rhymes pop up in everyday banter, meters appear in unlikely phrases.
Poetry just makes those natural patterns more evident, more closely bonded to
meaning.
Unlike prose, poetry is
essentially a spoken art. Fiction and nonfiction can be read out loud, but
poetry is meant to be read to live
human beings. Poetry is composed to
create the music of phonemes.
Some of the poets I admire
the most are the ones who can make words into music, without gilding the lily. Why
do so many people commit their favorite poems to memory? There is a power in
the rhythms of words when they are activated by syntax and meaning.
One of the first times I
really fell in love with poetry was when I was attending the Bronx High School
of Science (not the most likely venue for poetry!). My sophomore-year French
teacher, Janice Gerton, who is now in her 90s and remains an active fan of
literature, recited to the class a poem she had memorized by the poet Paul
Verlaine (1844–1896). The poem begins like this:
Il pleure dans mon
coeur
Comme il pleut sur la ville ;
Quelle est cette langueur
Qui pénètre mon coeur ?
Loosely translated, it sounds like
this in English:
Verlaine’s poem (I’ve
only quoted one stanza) is so haunting because the sounds of the words recreate
the murmur of the rainfall that is filling up the city. The repetitions are
oddly soothing, given that it’s a poem about deep and incomprehensible sadness.
Somehow, hearing or saying a poem this musical allows us both to feel our own
sorrow more deeply, and to begin to heal from it. A poem such as Verlaine’s is
like a magic spell, where the words create an actual physical effect in the
world.
I have a personal list of
poems I particularly enjoy where the music is extremely effective for me. Here
are some of my favorites, in no special order:
Those are poems that I love to recite or sing or hear read over
and over, just to experience how it feels to say those words, and how they
sound out loud.
When I was in college, a lot
my friends were trying what could be called controlled substances. After they returnedfrom various journeys of the imagination (sometimes jetlagged) their reactions were
often, “Wow! Indescribable. Words can’t express what I experienced.”
I was always a little dubious
when people reacted in that way to an ecstatic or psychedelic experience. Part
of the reason I was skeptical is that I was then reading a lot of poetry by the
French surrealists, who were particularly good at spinning out hallucinatory
imagery. Here’s an example from the long love poem by André Breton, “The Air of
the Water”:
But the earth was filled
with reflections deeper than those in water
As if metal had finally shaken off its shell
And you lying on the frightening ocean of precious gems
Were turning
Naked
In a huge sun of fireworks
I saw you slowly
evolving from the radiolarians
(translated by
Bill Zavatsky and Zack Rogow)
That’s about as trippy as it gets.
If you’ve had any visions more detailed or more dynamic than those, I want to
know what you were on. Breton’s imagery is not only visionary, it is also
sensual in a way that breaks rules.
It’s not just in
the realm of surreal imagery that poetry ventures into the unsayable. Poetry also
conveys ideas, emotions, and situations that are often considered taboo or verboten. In fact, poetry seems uniquely well-suited to expressing the inexpressible.
I’m thinking of a
book such as Linda McCarriston’s Eva-Mary,
where she shines the light of poetry on one some of the most difficult subjects
to speak about publicly, physical and sexual abuse within a family, in this
case, during her own childhood. Amazingly, McCarriston does this without
any loss of the texture of language that we hope to find in poetry. Issuing a summons to the judge who refused her mother’s plea to separate from her
violent husband, McCarriston writes:
…When you clamped
to her leg the
chain of justice,
you ferried us
back down to the law,
the black ice eye,
the maw, the mako
that circles the
kitchen table nightly.
("To Judge Faolain, Dead Long Enough: A Summons)
These few lines are so filled with
the imagery, diction, and music of poetry, that they are almost a textbook of
how a writer can shape language to express an idea powerfully in words. McCarriston
also speaks about another taboo subject in her poems: class.
So, next time you
think that visions, ideas, or experiences are beyond words, check out the
poetry shelf of your local library. I think you’ll find that poets have come
close to expressing those inexpressible truths. I hope those poems will empower
you to speak your own unspeakable truths.
There are many ways of making
political statements: speeches, nonfiction writing, posters—even literary
fiction. Why bother to use poetry, a much more labor-intensive and rarified
type of communication?
As a form of political
speech, I find poetry the most persuasive. By putting a political statement
into poetic language, the writer is challenged to make the diction as fresh,
immediate, and original as possible.
In his landmark essay
“Politics and the English Language,” George Orwell defines good writing as “picking
out words for the sake of their meaning and inventing images in order to make
the meaning clearer.” That’s exactly what poetry does at its best.
Let me give you an
example of how poetry can bring to life a political argument. Here are the
opening lines of one of my favorite poems by June Jordan, the great poet who
passed away ten years ago:
Infinity doesn’t interest me
not altogether
anymore
I crawl and kneel and grub about
I beg and listen for
what can go away
(as
easily as love)
or perish
like the children
running
hard on oneway streets/infinity
doesn’t interest me
(“On a New Year’s Eve”)
If you were to make the argument of
this poem in nonfiction prose, it would most likely fall flat on its face: “I believe that
living creatures are much more important than abstract concepts.” Boring. It’s the way
that June Jordan tackles the subject in poetry that makes it unforgettable and
convincing. First of all, she takes on “infinity.” You can’t take that type of verbal leap in a speech.
That one word, infinity, evokes so many things. Here, June Jordan seems to be
alluding to the tendency of organized religions to focus on the otherworldly,
as opposed to the here and now. It’s much more interesting and verbally
efficient of her to take on “infinity” as her antithesis, instead of an
elaborate prosy construct like the one I put into the previous sentence, or the
paraphrase in quotes above.
Then June Jordan
gives such a specific contrast to infinity: children. But not just any children,
“children/running/hard on oneway streets”—an image as vivid as a film clip. June
Jordan also uses the hard rhythms of the language to suggest those sneakers
smacking asphalt. She mentions “oneway streets,” as opposed to the two-way
streets of genuine dialogue and opportunity. These children might not be
fortunate enough to live on those wider and more prosperous boulevards. June
Jordan uses all these strategies tokeep
us involved in what is really a political and philosophical argument. Could
prose do that? And look: “infinity” appears again, but this time right after
the children, on the same line as their running on the streets, as if “infinity”
applies to the running children instead of being a mere abstraction, as it becomes again in the following line.
I could give many
other examples of poetry producing some of the most memorable
political statements. There is Percy Bysshe Shelley’s “Ozymandius,” mocking the
shattered statue of a fallen tyrant. What about Pablo Neruda’s hymn to the Spanish Republic, “I Explain A Few Things,” with its aching refrain, “Come see the blood in the streets”?
Or Paul Eluard’s lyrical
anthem to the resistance to fascism in World War II, “Liberty,” which was
actually scattered by allied airplanes as a leaflet when they flew over
occupied France.
Why write poetry? Aren't poems
pretty much irrelevant in the age of TikTok, X, and YouTube?
Who really reads
poetry any more? I’m a poet, and even I rarely buy a book of poems in a
bookstore and sit down and read it with no distractions. I probably spend more
hours reading fiction than poetry.
But poetry still
has power like no other art. It speaks directly to all the layers of the human
brain, and to the heart. Poetry is the language most at home with and familiar
to our bodies. I’m thinking about a great poem like Pablo Neruda’s “Barcarole”:
If only you would touch my
heart,
if only you were to put your mouth to my heart,
your delicate mouth, your teeth,
if you were to put your tongue like a red arrow
there where my dusty heart is beating,
if you were to blow on my heart near the sea, weeping,
it would make a dark noise, like the drowsy sound of
train wheels,
like the indecision of waters…
(translated by Robert Hass)
When I read those
lines, every cell in my body fizzes with excitement. I love fiction and nonfiction, too, but neither of those can do what that poem does. Even
though the images in Neruda's poem are dreamlike (the “tongue like a red arrow,” the “indecision
of waters”), they are so remarkably familiar to the mind. Those images seem to
travel naturally into the unconscious of the reader, by osmosis.
Pablo Neruda
If there is a personal or
intimate thought or feeling you want to convey, poetry is the best medium. No
form of address is as direct, or as passionate.
Maybe that’s part of why poetry
naturally seeks metaphor, because poems are so immediate. Poems require the
indirectness of metaphor to moderate and make palatable that extremely personal address,
just as it would be too intense to look a person right in the eyes the entire time you are speaking with
them.