In my last blog I tried to make
a case that The Big Moment, a passage where the author delivers a statement of
belief directly to the reader with no finesse, is not a useful strategy for a
writer. So, is it outmoded even to try to communicate a message or theme or
emotion in a work of literature? Maybe such a corny idea has been made obsolete
by postmodernism. Aren’t most people who read literature well-educated liberals
or social democrats who already think and feel the same way about most things?
There are certainly a lot of
authors who write as if they believe that a message or emotion is not important
to a work of literature, or that the message should be understood by the reader
even before approaching the writer’s work. I’m thinking of authors where there
are so many fragments or so little context in their work that very little of coherence
is expressed to the reader. Instead, the writing becomes shards of references
that the reader is either in on, or not. Mostly this type of work is read by
other writers or artists, often ones the author knows personally.
I have to agree with the poet
Pablo Neruda about this sort of writing. In his Memoirs, he describes an encounter with T.S. Eliot. I’m assuming
this is a fantasy of Neruda’s, since it’s a strange moment where Neruda says he
locks himself in the bathroom to avoid listening to Eliot reading his poems.
(Eliot’s poetry is generally written for a smaller and more elite audience than
Neruda’s.) Actually, Neruda only refers obliquely to Eliot’s work in this
passage.
Neruda concludes: “…if this
continues, poets will publish only for other poets…Each will pull out his
little book and put it in the other’s pocket…Poetry has lost its ties with the
reader…”
The work of the poets and
fiction writers who put chapbooks in one another’s pockets and never try to
reach a larger audience is work that doesn’t have a message, or doesn’t try to
convey emotion. It’s work organized as a collage of splinters, without any
attempt to change or move the reader. The writer assumes that the reader is
already in accord with his or her ideas or thoughts, and makes no attempt to
persuade or move. The author might allude to those shared beliefs or feelings
as a sort of common currency or in-joke with the reader, but there is no
attempt to deliver a message or emotion.
This is the situation that much
of poetry finds itself in today, at least in North America, and in other
regions of the globe as well. Nor is fiction exempt from this sort of writing.
And it’s this situation that Neruda worked his whole life to transcend, by
including a message in his wonderful lyrics, like a delicious dessert that includes
both ice cream and fresh fruit, so it’s both sweet to the tongue and nutritious
to eat.
In the next blog, I’ll talk
about some strategies for conveying messages that are not dogmatic or opaque.
Other recent posts about writing topics:
How to Get Published
Getting the Most from Your Writing Workshop
How Not to Become a Literary Dropout
Putting Together a Book Manuscript
Working with a Writing Mentor
How to Deliver Your Message
Does the Muse Have a Cell Phone?
Why Write Poetry?
Poetic Forms: Introduction; The Sonnet, The Sestina, The Ghazal, The Tanka
Praise and Lament
How to Be an American Writer