Showing posts with label Edna St. Vincent Millay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Edna St. Vincent Millay. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Writers I Can’t Stop Reading, Part 6: Edna St. Vincent Millay

Edna St. Vincent Millay (1892–1950) grew up in small towns in the state of Maine in the U.S.A. Millay’s mother was her only parent for most of her upbringing, and the family was so poor that Millay and her two sisters would sometimes ice skate in the living room on the water that had flooded their house from a nearby creek and had frozen. 

      Edna St. Vincent Millay by Washington Square Arch in Greenwich Village
 
Millay's mother was a visiting nurse who was often gone from the family. An intelligent, self-educated woman, Millay’s mother instilled in her three daughters a love of learning and poetry, as well as providing a strong role model. Here’s Millay’s tribute to her mother:

The courage that my mother had
Went with her, and is with her still:
Rock from New England quarried;
Now granite in a granite hill.
The golden brooch my mother wore
She left behind for me to wear;
I have no thing I treasure more:
Yet, it is something I could spare.
Oh, if instead she’d left to me
The thing she took into the grave!—
That courage like a rock, which she
Has no more need of, and I have.

By an odd set of circumstances, Edna St. Vincent Millay became a famous poet at the age of nineteen by losing a literary contest. She entered her poem “Renascence” in a contest called The Lyric Year, something like The Best Poems of … series that is published today. The judges wanted to pick Millay’s poem for the first prize, but when it became known that the winner was an unknown young woman from a small town, they changed their minds and gave her the fourth prize. A judge who opposed the decision publicized his grievance, and the ensuing scandal made Millay a literary celebrity, as well as helping her to gain a full scholarship to Vassar College.

Millay (who went by the nickname “Vincent”) went on from there to conquer Greenwich Village’s literary bohemia. She wrote startling poetry that embodied the values of the Roaring 20s and the radical 1930s: free love, opposition to World War I, support for the republic in the Spanish Civil War. Here is her Sonnet CXXVIII, with its frank confessions:

I too beneath your moon, almighty Sex,
Go forth at nightfall crying like a cat,
Leaving the lofty tower I labored at
For birds to foul and boys and girls to vex
With tittering chalk; and you, and the long necks
Of neighbors sitting where their mothers sat
Are well aware of shadowy this and that
In me, that’s neither noble nor complex.
Such as I am, however, I have brought
To what it is, this tower; it is my own;
Though it was reared To Beauty, it was wrought
From what I had to build with: honest bone
Is there, and anguish; pride; and burning thought;
And lust is there, and nights not spent alone.

I keep going back to Millay’s poetry, partly because she is such an unapologetic advocate of passion, but with so many nuances—check out the word "anguish" in the penultimate line of this sonnet. I also read her poems over and over because she chooses such unusual and modern topics, curiously combined with a retro love for and mastery of the sonnet form, particularly the very continental Petrarchan sonnet, while most English-language poets favor the Shakespearean. This is one of my favorite sonnets of Millay’s, because it contains such a modern sensibility in an ornately carved ivory box:

Sonnet XLIII

Still will I harvest beauty where it grows:
In coloured fungus and the spotted fog
Surprised on foods forgotten; in ditch and bog
Filmed brilliant with irregular rainbows
Of rust and oil, where half a city throws
Its empty tins; and in some spongy log
Whence headlong leaps the oozy emerald frog….
And a black pupil in the green scum shows.
Her the inhabiter of diverse places
Surmising at all doors, I push them all.
Oh, you that fearful of a creaking hinge
Turn back forevermore with craven faces,
I tell you Beauty bears an ultra fringe
Unguessed of you upon her gossamer shawl!

This is not just a poem about pretty, little moments. It’s about seeking and still finding beauty in a world where pollution and urban life deposit “rust and oil” in nature. The last four lines contain a challenge to anyone who refuses to see that our era, flawed by progress though it may be, is still a time of great beauty, beauty that might be more “ultra” (what a great word!) than what came before.

Millay was also a philosopher. Her literary work features five plays in verse, including Conversations at Midnight, where a group of men conduct an after-dinner Platonic dialogue over whiskey and cigars, discussing politics, art, and other topics. The play has an interesting history. Millay wrote a draft of it while on a road trip in Florida with her husband in 1936. The two of them checked into their room at a hotel and went for a walk. As they returned from their stroll, they noticed a column of smoke rising in the air. The hotel had burned down, along with her manuscript. Millay had to recreate the entire script from memory.

Among Millay’s more philosophical works, I like many of her later sonnets where she contemplates the large questions—the place of humanity in the long history of Earth and in the cosmos. Here is her Sonnet CXXIV, again featuring the moon:

Enormous moon, that rise behind these hills
Heavy and yellow in a sky unstarred
And pale, your girth by purple fillets barred
Of drifting cloud, that as the cool sky fills
With planets and the brighter stars, distills
To thinnest vapor and floats valley-ward,—
You flood with radiance all this cluttered yard,
The sagging fence, the chipping window sills.
Grateful at heart as if for my delight
You rose, I watch you through a mist of tears,
Thinking how man, who gags upon despair,
Salting his hunger with the sweat of fright
Has fed on cold indifference all these years,
Calling it kindness, calling it God’s care.

Fascinating that she uses "rise" for the moon in line 1 and not "rises." I think she is addressing the moon—"you that rise." What is so haunting for me about this poem is that Millay refuses a sloppy faith in a caring divinity she cannot see in the skies. But this is not a bleak world she describes, despite the absence of a god or goddess to protect us. There are sagging fences and chipping window sills and tears of pity for the millennia of ignorance that came before. But Millay balances those imperfections with the plenitude of a twilight where the moon floats upward as “the cool sky fills/With planets and brighter stars ...”
_________________________________
Zack’s new book of poetry, The Kama Sutra for Senior Citizens and Other Poems on Aging. Order in the USA    Order in the UK
Other posts of interest:

How to Get Published

Getting the Most from Your Writing Workshop

How Not to Become a Literary Dropout

Putting Together a Book Manuscript

Working with a Writing Mentor

How to Deliver Your Message

Does the Muse Have a Cell Phone?

Why Write Poetry?

Poetic Forms: Introduction, the Sonnet, the Sestina, the Ghazal, the Tanka, the Villanelle

Praise and Lament

How to Be an American Writer

Writers and Collaboration

Types of Closure in Poetry

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Writers I Can't Stop Reading, Part 5: June Jordan

There are so many qualities I admire in June Jordan’s work that it’s hard to know where to begin. 


                                                           June Jordan

I’ll start with the experience of hearing June read her poetry out loud. It was literally a physical sensation. Hearing her read, there were times when I would laugh as hard as I ever have—June was one of the funniest human beings I’ve known. At other times I thought I was going to burst out sobbing, and I couldn’t hold back a few tears. Sometimes I got goose bumps, and the hair on my arms stood up. Other passages in her poetry were incredibly sexy. It wasn’t like the experience of hearing any other poet. Why?
June committed herself to her readings like no one else She believed 100% in what she was saying in her writing. Maybe that’s how she had the courage to stand up in front of a large audience and read in a dialect of English—Black English—that most people just considered wrong. June helped to revive and honor Black English as a literary medium, and she wrote gracefully and adamantly about its beauty and unique grammar. In her essay written in 1972, “White English/Black English: The Politics of Translation,” from her book Civil Wars, June quotes Shakespeare’s Elizabethan diction and concludes, “Now that ain hardly standard English.” She asserts that “…the Elizabethan, nonstandard English of Romeo and Juliet has been adjudged, by the powerful, as something students should tackle and absorb. By contrast, the Black, nonstandard language of my novel, His Own Where, has been adjudged, by the powerful, as substandard and even injurious to young readers.” She was not afraid to measure her way of speaking and writing English against Shakespeare’s.
Maybe June Jordan could evoke such a response from her audience because she spoke out against crimes and injustices that you just weren’t supposed to talk about in polite company. She championed the rights of so many, from Puerto Rican and Palestinian independence to Blacks who experienced police violence.
Maybe she reached that level in her readings because her way of living was a full-court press. She knew she had only a limited time to make her points, and she made them regardless of what anyone else thought she should be saying. June resisted being pigeon-holed in any way: “Make up your mind! They said. Are you militant or sweet? Are you vegetarian or meat? Are you straight or are you gay?/And I said, Hey! It’s not about my mind.” (from “A Short Note to My Very Critical and Well-Beloved Friends and Comrades” in her book Passion)
At a time when many writers and literary critics in the U.S.A. regarded love poetry as a naive throwback to Edna St. Vincent Millay and the flapper era of the Roaring 20s, June took to heart the work of writing great poems of passion. She looked not to T.S. Eliot and the New Critics and as her role models, but to Pablo Neruda and Walt Whitman.
Part of the appeal of her writing is her amazingly musical sense for language. While she was an undergraduate at Barnard College, June studied piano with a faculty member at the Julliard School of Music. She was at that level in her instrumental talents. Given the musicality of her poetry, it’s not surprising that June collaborated with a stellar array of composers, including Leonard Bernstein, Bernice Johnson Reagon, John Adams, and Adrienne Torf. Here are some of the concluding lines of her great poem, “On a New Year’s Eve”:

but all alive and all the lives
persist perpetual
in jeopardy
persist
as scarce as every one of us
as difficult to find
or keep
as irreplaceable
as frail
as every one of us…

all things are dear
that disappear

__________________________

Zack’s most recent book of poetry, Irreverent Litanies

Friday, March 29, 2013

Writers I Can't Stop Reading, Part 1: Introduction

There are certain writers that I start reading, and once I dig into that person’s work, I can’t stop. I have to read all of it. For each writer I feel that way about, there’s a different reason the work is appealing to me.

Then there are other writers I read because someone recommended their work, or I saw an enthusiastic review. I read one book by that author. I might even enjoy the book, but I feel one is enough. I don’t get the sense that I need to know more about that writer’s project or style. I imagine many writers must have those differing responses to what they read. Some writers grab us by the collar and drag us down, and we can’t get loose. Others just give us a sweet little peck on the cheek and bid us farewell.

The writers where I have to read all they wrote, or almost all, are writers who can do something I can’t, or have a quality I’d love to have. I even want to be that writer, at least while I’m reading a book by that author. Sometimes the quality I admire most in that writer is one I hope to emulate. Other times, it’s one I would like to emulate but know I never can. They are just too good at what they do.

In the next few blogs I’m going to discuss some of the writers whose work really grabs me, and why, and some of the writers whose work feels as if I like it, but I don’t need more of it. What differentiates those two types of writers?

T he writers I plan to discuss in this series of blogs include George Orwell, Willa CatherVirginia Woolf,  June Jordan, and Edna St. Vincent Millay.

Other recent posts about writing topics: 
How to Get Published
Getting the Most from Your Writing Workshop
How Not to Become a Literary Dropout
Putting Together a Book Manuscript
Working with a Writing Mentor
How to Deliver Your Message
Does the Muse Have a Cell Phone?
Why Write Poetry? 
Poetic Forms: IntroductionThe SonnetThe SestinaThe GhazalThe Tanka

Praise and Lament
How to Be an American Writer